|
July
2005:
Reflections on the G8 Summit
A discussion on the outcomes of the G8
Summit in Gleneagles relevant to HIV/AIDS.
Presenters:
Hilary Benn MP,
Secretary of State for DFID
Professor Charles
Gilks, Director and Co-ordinator of the Treatment and Prevention
Scale-up team in the HIV Department, WHO.
Dr. Seydou Dia,
Emergency & Human Security Advisor, West Africa Region, Action Aid
International
The speech by Hilary Benn MP is reproduced below. the
presentation by Dr Dia can be opened or downloaded as
WORD documents by following the links above. A copy of the presentation by
Professor Gilks is available from the APPG AIDS on request.
Abstract:
Laura Moffatt MP
introduced the speakers and thanked Tyco Healthcare for sponsoring the
meeting. She also thanked the members of the APPG AIDS and colleagues from
the HIV Sector for attending the meeting and for their continuing support
of the group.
Rt. Hon. Hilary Benn MP,
Secretary of State DFID :
Thank you for inviting me
to speak today. And thanks to Neil Gerrard, as chair, for the excellent
work of this group. This is a good moment for us to reflect on the year so
far.
This has been an
extraordinary year. I can’t remember a time when development was more at
the centre of political debates. Development is now a moral and practical
cause whose time has come.
Millions of people are
rallying to this cause. In Edinburgh we marched as a white tide encircling
the castle, calling for poverty to be made history. The Live8 concerts
were watched by 2 billion, and raised the world’s biggest ever petition.
Asking for action: not charity, but justice.
I think what was achieved
at Gleneagles was very significant. A historic package to help Africa.
Fair to say, I think, the most the G8 has ever done for Africa and poverty
eradication. Who would have thought – a year, let alone 5 years ago –
that these things would be possible?
This is progress by any
measure. Will it make poverty or AIDS history? Maybe not yet. But it has
put us in a stronger position to do so.
How did this happen?
Because people – lots of people, some in this room today, have argued
strongly and consistently for it.
As you all know the fight
against AIDS has been an important part of our work for some time now –
our Call for Action, launched at the London Lighthouse on World AIDS day
in 2003; our new Strategy, Taking Action, launched by the Prime Minister a
year ago tomorrow, and this year during our Presidencies of the G8 and EU.
It is clear that AIDS is
undermining global efforts to eradicate poverty. Our actions, therefore,
must match the scale of the epidemic itself. So what have we done?
In publishing “Taking
Action” we announced that we would put at least £1.5 billion over three
years into tackling AIDS. The largest ever UK investment on AIDS. And of
this, £150 million will be for orphans and other children affected by
AIDS. Taking Action also committed us to a leadership role, as we looked
ahead, at that time, to our Presidencies in 2005.
So what did we achieve at
Gleneagles?
We made extraordinary
progress on aid. A commitment to increase global aid by an additional $50
billion by 2010, with half - $25 billion - going to Africa. We are now
reversing the shameful decline in aid - remember, in the mid-1990s,
per-capita aid to Africa collapsed by a half. And
a commitment by 15 EU countries to finally
reach the long held UN 0.7% target by 2015. And
Britain has
set a target of
2013.
G8 Finance Ministers
agreed to debt cancellation worth up to $55 billion, and helped the Paris
Club agree the biggest ever African deal on debt for Nigeria, worth $17
billion, and where Nigeria has committed to use these new resources for
poverty reduction.
And, specifically on AIDS,
I think it’s worth taking a close look at the Communiqué text itself.
“With the
aim of an AIDS-free generation in Africa”
An AIDS-free
generation in Africa. Now wouldn’t that be an extraordinary prize? Ending
the 6,000 new infections every day; treating the 6 million who could
already benefit from treatment.
“significantly reducing HIV infections and working with WHO, UNAIDS and
other international bodies to develop and implement a package for HIV
prevention, treatment and care”
This builds
on the UNGASS target, but, crucially, commits the G8 to further action.
We now have to work together to implement what’s been agreed. There are
already discussions underway with UNAIDS, WHO, our G8 colleagues and
others, and we will have started to develop this early in September.
I can’t
emphasise enough the importance of a comprehensive response – and that
must include prevention. We
need to both stop infection through prevention, and treat those already
living with AIDS.
We hear a lot about the
treatment gap, but let’s not forget that only 20% of poor people have
access to the prevention services they need. I am very proud of the role
the UK played, and let me pay tribute to Gareth Thomas here, in securing a
strong new UNAIDS HIV Prevention Policy just before Gleneagles.
It will help countries
quickly provide expanded prevention programmes: Prevention programmes that
are evidence-based, human rights-based and respond to the realities faced
by communities. And that means delivering sexual and reproductive health
services, condoms, and harm reduction – which includes clean needles and
syringes to drug users who need them.
The G8 also emphasised -
for the first time ever - the need to develop a safe and effective
microbicide. New technologies are vital to give women the power to protect
themselves from HIV infection. The communiqué called for advance purchase
commitments and other innovative finance tools to encourage increased
investment in microbicide and vaccine research and development.
This year the UK will do
all we can to support this effort and maintain HIV prevention momentum
throughout. That is why on World AIDS Day on 1st December, as
part of our UK Presidency of the EU, we plan to hold a major event on
prevention.
“with the
aim of as close as possible to universal access to treatment for all those
who need it by 2010”
This
commitment moves us a long way forward. It builds on the WHO and UNAIDS “3
by 5” initiative - to get 3 million people on treatment by 2005. And
while it is now clear that we will not reach that ambitious target, as the
UN’s African AIDS envoy, Stephen Lewis has said, this has been an
incredibly successful initiative. It has provided important momentum and
leadership – and 1 million people on treatment are alive now who wouldn’t
have been without it. I’m delighted that Charlie Gilks, who leads the 3
by 5 effort in WHO, is here today and I look forward to hearing more from
him. And let me say how pleased I am to be able to provide Charlie on
secondment to WHO today.
This new AIDS treatment
target signals our clear ambition.
“Limited
health systems capacity is a major constraint to achieving this and we
will work with our partners in Africa to address this, including
supporting the establishment of reliable and accountable supply chain
management and reporting systems”
We will only reach this
target if there are major improvements to existing health care services.
Without these we get good quality anti-retroviral treatment and care to
people who need it. More effective services will help remove bottlenecks
in drug production and supply, and they rely on more doctors and nurses
being employed, better efforts to promote awareness and availability of
services, greater NGO effort to make treatment effective, and a massive
increase in testing facilities so people can find out if they need
treatment.
And we will only make
progress on any of the diseases of poverty if we invest enough in the
national health services of the poorest countries. We need to help them
provide basic services for free, if that is what their governments want to
do, and make these services more effective. DFID is already a major donor
to the health sector, including through budget support, and we will be
doing more.
Our support in Uganda
helped the Government end user fees for basic services, and we have
invested £100 million in the Malawi health service. We will learn from
these and other innovative approaches and take similar steps in the
countries that want our help. One of the priorities for the IMF and World
Bank annual meetings in late September is the expansion of health
services, alongside supporting more effective AIDS programmes.
“We will
also work with them to ensure that all children left orphaned or
vulnerable by AIDS or other pandemics are given proper support”
A comprehensive response
to the epidemic must include reducing the numbers of children affected by
AIDS, and providing those young people already orphaned and affected, with
all the help they need. To be concrete - I mean free and good quality
schooling and health care; an environment where young people can make
informed choices and have those choices respected, and where sexual and
reproductive health services are on offer to all young people, as well as
adults.
Young people are extremely
vulnerable, and without the measures I have just described, can easily
face a future of despair, not hope. And for vulnerable families, home
support, and income support through cash payments, is absolutely vital.
The UK will continue to
push – as hard as we can - to get these responses right – and that is
why, in early November, we will host with UNICEF, the Global Partners
Forum to help build momentum around the need to provide proper support to
these children.
“We will
work to meet the financing needs for HIV/AIDS, including through the
replenishment this year of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria”
UNAIDS have estimated how
much is needed to do more to fight AIDS in low and middle income
countries. They think that at least $15 billion is needed in 2006, $18
billion in 2007, and $22 billion in 2008, in order for these countries to
mount an effective response to AIDS.
The Global Fund tells us
they need $7 billion to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria for the years 2006 and
2007. By hosting their Replenishment Conference we are doing our bit to
make sure the Fund achieves a far more ambitious funding level. As EU
President, we are already working with our European partners to encourage
an even stronger European commitment, as well as encouraging all our G8
partners and others to do their bit.
The Global Fund is
incredibly important – but we also know that it is only one part of what
is needed. This is why at the replenishment conference we will have a
special session to take forward the recommendations of the Global Task
Team.
Because unless we get all
of the donors to work well together, countries won’t be able to fight AIDS
effectively. And at that meeting UNAIDS will also report on their Resource
Needs estimates. These estimates have been based on a very broad
assessment of the services and infrastructure required for AIDS at a
sufficient scale to reach all in need by 2010.
Clearly there are huge
needs. But this year we have made extraordinary progress in raising new
money, and I’ll talk more on this in a moment. But let’s be clear that
these overall increases in aid will contribute to - at the very least –
the ability of countries to fight AIDS across all fronts - many of which
have been costed in the UNAIDS estimates.
“and
actively working with local stakeholders to implement the '3 Ones'
principles in all countries”
We don’t just need to
provide more money, we also need to ensure it works. The UK has led the
way on the 3 Ones, and this is now firmly embedded in the global response
to AIDS. And that is where the Global Task Team fits in. It was set up at
the “Making the Money Work” meeting – that we held in London on March 9 –
and has brought together all those involved, to find ways of improving
coordination.
At the moment four
different UN agencies claim to take the lead on youth HIV prevention.
Clearly that can’t be right – and it doesn’t help countries fight AIDS.
That is where the Global Task Team is making progress – working out the
best way to share efforts, and putting in place timetables to bring about
real change. I applaud the excellent work UNAIDS has done on this. We will
continue to give this our full support.
So, what does all this
mean on the ground, in the poorest countries?
Well, last year I visited
Zambia, one of the worst hit countries, where 16% of the adult population
already has HIV – up to a million people, and where almost 1 in 10 of the
population is an orphan. Kalingalinga is in a densely populated part of
Lusaka, and here 1 in 5 people have HIV. The mother and child clinic I
visited has a staff vacancy rate of over a third, and yet offers free
treatment. And whereas worldwide only 10% of pregnant women have access to
the drugs that can prevent HIV transmission to their babies, here 90% of
the mothers who visit the clinic get tested and treated – a very high
number given the stigma attached to AIDS.
As I remember, they had
around 1,000 people on ARVs – with 5 staff – and hoped to have 5,000 on
ARVs by the end of the year – still with the same 5 staff.
And more broadly we are
supporting the Zambian government through a £20 million programme to
improve health care services – without which very little progress on AIDS
is possible; the UK gives another £20 million for direct support to AIDS,
and a further £10 million for social protection work, which reaches many
vulnerable families, and includes support for orphans.
The work I saw is a model
of what is required across Zambia, across Africa, and globally. Yet there
are big challenges - only 23,000 people in Zambia are on treatment, yet
WHO estimate that almost 150,000 need treatment. And there is no excuse
for delay, as Nelson Mandela said in 2003, “We must start now… If we
discard the people who are dying from AIDS, then we can no longer call
ourselves decent people.”
And that is why the steps
we have made at the G8 are so important. They will go someway to ensuring
progress, and not just in Zambia, but in all of the poorest countries.
The new aid committed by
the G8 and Europe will begin to narrow the finance gap, but clearly the
world still needs to do more.
That is why the UK has
called for the International Finance Facility as a means to front-load aid
to meet these needs. As a first step, we hope to get technical agreement
on the IFF pilot for immunisation at the beginning of August – and if
launched - we currently have support from France, Germany, Spain and
Sweden – this initiative could save the lives of 5 million people, would
help improve national immunisation services, and by offering a secure
market, would encourage investment and competition in vaccine production.
And because we all still
need to do more, the UK also supports the use of air passenger taxes to
raise money for development, and in particular the health sector.
And we hope to make more
progress this year too.
Our objective is to agree
ambitious targets at the September UN Millennium Review Summit: a global
commitment to universal access to HIV prevention and AIDS treatment by
2010; support to all orphans and children affected by AIDS; meeting the
resource needs, including for the Global Fund, and making these resources
more effective through implementing the “Three Ones” principles and
progressing the Global Task Team’s recommendations.
We recognise that the 2000
Millennium Summit did not give enough attention to sexual and reproductive
health. We want the September Summit to rectify this, not least to
reflect the importance of sexual and reproductive health services as a
cornerstone of efforts to prevent HIV. Negotiations on the September 2005
World Summit outcome are happening now, and we are engaging closely to
ensure HIV and AIDS issues, and related reproductive health issues, are
properly dealt with.
We know what needs to be
done, and now we have more of the means to make a big difference. This
will not be easy. The progress we want will take many years. But what we
have achieved recently shows what can be done if we all put our minds to
it, and if we all work together.
That is why I applaud all
of your hard work to make the G8 agreements such a success, why I am
hopeful for the future, and why I do believe we will ultimately be
successful.
Thank you.
|